December 3, 2013 Board of County Commissioners
»
Call to Order & Proclamation - Call to Order by Chair
Roll Call by the Clerk of the Court
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Proclamation
Call to Order & Proclamation
Call to Order by ChairRoll Call by the Clerk of the Court
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Proclamation
»
Public Comment - Public Comment
Public Comment
Public Comment»
Consent Agenda - Consent Agenda
Items 1 - 13
Consent Agenda
Consent AgendaItems 1 - 13
»
Approval of the Regular Agenda - Additions/Deletions to Regular Agenda
Approval of Regular Agenda
Approval of the Regular Agenda
Additions/Deletions to Regular AgendaApproval of Regular Agenda
»
Item 1 - Public Hearing - Transmittal Hearing – COMPAMD 2013-05 Bartram Park DRI. This
is a transmittal hearing for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment related to the Bartram Park
DRI located in St. Johns County, to amend a residential portion of the DRI from
Residential-A to Residential-B, with a Text Amendment limiting the residential dwelling
units to 616, for approximately 583 acres of land located along the north side of Racetrack
Road. The Planning and Zoning Agency recommended approval with a 7-0 vote at its
November 7, 2013 meeting.
Item 1
Public Hearing - Transmittal Hearing – COMPAMD 2013-05 Bartram Park DRI. Thisis a transmittal hearing for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment related to the Bartram Park
DRI located in St. Johns County, to amend a residential portion of the DRI from
Residential-A to Residential-B, with a Text Amendment limiting the residential dwelling
units to 616, for approximately 583 acres of land located along the north side of Racetrack
Road. The Planning and Zoning Agency recommended approval with a 7-0 vote at its
November 7, 2013 meeting.
»
Item 2 - Public Hearing - DEVAGRMOD 2013-01 Sunshine Holdings Development Agreement
Modification. Two public hearings are required to modify a Development Agreement. This
is the second of the two required public hearings. The first public hearing was held on
November 5, 2013 before the BCC. The Sunshine Holdings Development Agreement was
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 23, 2005 for the Palm Lakes
PUD, Sunshine 13 PUD, Sunshine 16 PUD (collectively referred to as Murabella), the
Samara Lakes PUD, and the Liberty Park PUD (recently changed to Gran Lake PUD) to
mitigate for project impacts to Pacetti Road and the SR 16/IGP/Pacetti Road intersection.
The request for modification seeks to add 17.57 acres of land, which at the writing of this
report, is under review to be incorporated within the Sunshine 16 PUD pursuant to
COMPAMD 2013-01 and MAJMOD 2013-02; approval of additional road impact fee credit
for costs that resulted from design changes required by a permitting agency pursuant to
Section 11.a of the Agreement in the total amount of $317,723.48; and to relieve the
developments from the remainder of the Phase II intersection improvements based on an
updated analysis of the SR 16/IGP/Pacetti Road intersection.
Item 2
Public Hearing - DEVAGRMOD 2013-01 Sunshine Holdings Development AgreementModification. Two public hearings are required to modify a Development Agreement. This
is the second of the two required public hearings. The first public hearing was held on
November 5, 2013 before the BCC. The Sunshine Holdings Development Agreement was
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 23, 2005 for the Palm Lakes
PUD, Sunshine 13 PUD, Sunshine 16 PUD (collectively referred to as Murabella), the
Samara Lakes PUD, and the Liberty Park PUD (recently changed to Gran Lake PUD) to
mitigate for project impacts to Pacetti Road and the SR 16/IGP/Pacetti Road intersection.
The request for modification seeks to add 17.57 acres of land, which at the writing of this
report, is under review to be incorporated within the Sunshine 16 PUD pursuant to
COMPAMD 2013-01 and MAJMOD 2013-02; approval of additional road impact fee credit
for costs that resulted from design changes required by a permitting agency pursuant to
Section 11.a of the Agreement in the total amount of $317,723.48; and to relieve the
developments from the remainder of the Phase II intersection improvements based on an
updated analysis of the SR 16/IGP/Pacetti Road intersection.
»
Item 3 - Public Hearing - MAJMOD 2013-07 St. Johns Interchange Parcels Planned Unit
Development. This is a proposed Major Modification to the St. Johns Interchange Parcels
Planned Unit Development Text to add Assisted Living Facility (ALF) to the Industrial
category Master Development Plan Text specific to Sub parcel 10.3 to allow the conversion of
an existing hotel to an ALF. Staff recommends approval based on its consistency with the
Future Land Use Designation of DRI, consistency with development trends in the area and
compatibility with surrounding properties. The Planning and Zoning Agency approved of the
MAJMOD 2013-02 by a vote of 4-1 at its October 17, 2013 meeting.
Item 3
Public Hearing - MAJMOD 2013-07 St. Johns Interchange Parcels Planned UnitDevelopment. This is a proposed Major Modification to the St. Johns Interchange Parcels
Planned Unit Development Text to add Assisted Living Facility (ALF) to the Industrial
category Master Development Plan Text specific to Sub parcel 10.3 to allow the conversion of
an existing hotel to an ALF. Staff recommends approval based on its consistency with the
Future Land Use Designation of DRI, consistency with development trends in the area and
compatibility with surrounding properties. The Planning and Zoning Agency approved of the
MAJMOD 2013-02 by a vote of 4-1 at its October 17, 2013 meeting.
»
Item 5 - Consider a Resolution approving and authorizing the execution of the Maintenance
Agreement for Sawgrass Resort Waterways and Channels
Item 5
Consider a Resolution approving and authorizing the execution of the MaintenanceAgreement for Sawgrass Resort Waterways and Channels
»
Item 6 - Consider a transfer of $3.1 million from the Transportation Trust Fund Contingency
Reserve to finalize the funding for the CR210/I-95 Interchange Improvements
Project.
Item 6
Consider a transfer of $3.1 million from the Transportation Trust Fund ContingencyReserve to finalize the funding for the CR210/I-95 Interchange Improvements
Project.
»
Item 7 - Consider a Resolution authorizing the County Administrator, or his designee, to
award a contract for Bid #13-25R County Road 210 at Interstate 95 – Phase 2
Improvements Re-Bid to Petticoat-Schmitt Civil Contractors, Inc. as the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder for a Lump Sum Bid of $9,407,051.50 (Base Bid “A” -
$8,514,408.79 + Alternate 1-A - $892,642.71) and to allow County Staff to investigate and
negotiate value engineering opportunities with the successful bidder that best serve the
interests of St. Johns County
Item 7
Consider a Resolution authorizing the County Administrator, or his designee, toaward a contract for Bid #13-25R County Road 210 at Interstate 95 – Phase 2
Improvements Re-Bid to Petticoat-Schmitt Civil Contractors, Inc. as the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder for a Lump Sum Bid of $9,407,051.50 (Base Bid “A” -
$8,514,408.79 + Alternate 1-A - $892,642.71) and to allow County Staff to investigate and
negotiate value engineering opportunities with the successful bidder that best serve the
interests of St. Johns County
»
Item 8 - Presenter – David Migut, Senior Assistant County Attorney
8. Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Flavored Tobacco Ordinance.
This ordinance will prohibit any person, business, tobacco retailer, or other vendor
from placing any flavored tobacco products in an open display unit or selling flavored
tobacco products by any means other than a vendor-assisted sale in which the customer
has no access to the flavored tobacco product without the assistance of the vendor. This
restriction shall not apply to any establishment that prohibits persons less than 18 years
of age on the premises. The ordinance provides for any enforcement action or legal remedy
available under Florida law, including, but not limited to, a fine not exceeding $500 or by
imprisonment for a term not exceeding (60) days for a violation of the ordinance.
Presenter –
Item 8
Presenter – David Migut, Senior Assistant County Attorney8. Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Flavored Tobacco Ordinance.
This ordinance will prohibit any person, business, tobacco retailer, or other vendor
from placing any flavored tobacco products in an open display unit or selling flavored
tobacco products by any means other than a vendor-assisted sale in which the customer
has no access to the flavored tobacco product without the assistance of the vendor. This
restriction shall not apply to any establishment that prohibits persons less than 18 years
of age on the premises. The ordinance provides for any enforcement action or legal remedy
available under Florida law, including, but not limited to, a fine not exceeding $500 or by
imprisonment for a term not exceeding (60) days for a violation of the ordinance.
Presenter –
»
Item 9 - Presenter – Rebecca Lavie, Assistant County Attorney
9. Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Hazardous Materials Ordinance.
It is in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the people of St. Johns County
for the Board to pass laws that promote clean air, water, and soil and protect wildlife and
plants within the County. When hazardous materials are released into the environment, it has
a negative effect on the quality of the air, water, and soil, is harmful to wildlife and plants, and
poses a risk to human health, safety, and welfare. When hazardous materials are released into
the environment, the County may be required to take remedial measures to clean up the
materials and abate the effects of their release. When the County is required to respond to an
incident of hazardous materials being released into the environment, it is appropriate for the
party who is responsible for the release of the hazardous materials to compensate the County
for the costs expended in connection with the County’s response. The County is authorized
under Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, to act in the common interest of the people of the County
where such actions are not inconsistent with Florida law. It is in the common interest of the
people of the County, and is not inconsistent with Florida law, for the County to require parties
who are responsible for the release of hazardous materials into the environment to compensate
the County for costs expended in connection with the County’s clean-up and abatement of the
effects of the released materials. This ordinance shall provide for recovery by the County of
costs incurred in emergency response, incident assessment, control, containment, and
abatement efforts directly related to the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
Item 9
Presenter – Rebecca Lavie, Assistant County Attorney9. Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Hazardous Materials Ordinance.
It is in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the people of St. Johns County
for the Board to pass laws that promote clean air, water, and soil and protect wildlife and
plants within the County. When hazardous materials are released into the environment, it has
a negative effect on the quality of the air, water, and soil, is harmful to wildlife and plants, and
poses a risk to human health, safety, and welfare. When hazardous materials are released into
the environment, the County may be required to take remedial measures to clean up the
materials and abate the effects of their release. When the County is required to respond to an
incident of hazardous materials being released into the environment, it is appropriate for the
party who is responsible for the release of the hazardous materials to compensate the County
for the costs expended in connection with the County’s response. The County is authorized
under Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, to act in the common interest of the people of the County
where such actions are not inconsistent with Florida law. It is in the common interest of the
people of the County, and is not inconsistent with Florida law, for the County to require parties
who are responsible for the release of hazardous materials into the environment to compensate
the County for costs expended in connection with the County’s clean-up and abatement of the
effects of the released materials. This ordinance shall provide for recovery by the County of
costs incurred in emergency response, incident assessment, control, containment, and
abatement efforts directly related to the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
»
Item 10 - Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Repealer Ordinance. In support
of the Board’s goals and objectives, the Office of the County Attorney is working to
identify ordinances that have been superseded by statute or that are outdated,
redundant, or no longer in the public interest. Once identified, these ordinances can
be removed from the County Code, thereby providing the public with more efficient
access to the County’s ordinances that are still in effect. This ordinance is the first
step in this process. It identifies ordinances that have either been repealed or that
have been superseded by state law. It removes the ordinances that have already been
repealed from the County Code, and it repeals the superseded ordinances and directs
their removal from the County Code, as well. The ordinance also directs the Clerk to
maintain a compilation of the repealed ordinances separate from the County Code.
Item 10
Public Hearing – Second Hearing and Enactment of Repealer Ordinance. In supportof the Board’s goals and objectives, the Office of the County Attorney is working to
identify ordinances that have been superseded by statute or that are outdated,
redundant, or no longer in the public interest. Once identified, these ordinances can
be removed from the County Code, thereby providing the public with more efficient
access to the County’s ordinances that are still in effect. This ordinance is the first
step in this process. It identifies ordinances that have either been repealed or that
have been superseded by state law. It removes the ordinances that have already been
repealed from the County Code, and it repeals the superseded ordinances and directs
their removal from the County Code, as well. The ordinance also directs the Clerk to
maintain a compilation of the repealed ordinances separate from the County Code.
»
Reports - Commissioners’ Reports
County Administrator’s Report
County Attorney’s Report
Clerk of Court’s Report
Reports
Commissioners’ ReportsCounty Administrator’s Report
County Attorney’s Report
Clerk of Court’s Report
© 2024 Swagit Productions, LLC